Tower Servers vs. Rack Servers vs. Blade Servers

Continuing my hardware series let me try to put the basic differences between above three.

Tower Servers are the normal boxes (in appearance) you would have seen in Visio Diagrams. Of course they are very powerful & have bundled software tools to manage them. The problem with Tower Severs is the space they occupy, management personnel they require, and cost of operating them (power, network, etc.).

Rack Servers are servers mounted inside a Rack (something like we normally use to manage our letters, office files, etc.) Major Racks available out there adhere to an IEEE standard and are measured in rack units or “U’s” (each U is 19” wide and 1.75” tall). So a rack server size is typically in multiplication of these “U’s”. Motivation here is to scale vertically than horizontally with more compact physical servers. In addition to this, there are many other electronic devices which adhere to this IEEE standard for instance – Rack Consoles, SAN devices, Power Backup devices, etc. Advantage being that you can fix them into rack as well along with your servers. Not to mention that the hardware vendors (Dell, HP, IBM, etc.) provide additional software tools that help you effectively manage these servers and in some cases the supported devices also.

Blade Servers are an additional level of innovation on top of Rack Servers. Blade Servers are typically placed inside a blade enclosure, and together they form a blade system. A Blade system normally meets the IEEE standard of Rack Units, which means that the entire Blade system can be placed inside the rack along with other electronic equipments. The benefits of blade enclosure includes hot plugging (normally blade servers have a handle attached to them, for transferring them in and out of the blade enclosure – it’s an easy way of identifying them) and stripped modular design (e.g. shared network ports, power connections, switches, etc.). For instance the hardware we ordered allows us to pack 16 blade servers inside a 10U space. I remember meeting an Oracle Consultant few months back where he was touting about a server with no disk. Such scenarios are possible (and are cheaper) by coupling a blade system and SAN storage. All these boils down to further space reduction, cost savings (power, administration staff) & easy management. Bundle this with Virtualization and you have a very powerful infrastructure at your disposal.

So any guesses as to what the next generation of servers would be 🙂 ?


4 thoughts on “Tower Servers vs. Rack Servers vs. Blade Servers

  1. Next generation of servers is upon us…and that is the Cloud. No longer will it be cost effective to have any major server hardward on site.

    So, what you will see is hardward vacating your a-typical businesses and the focus moving to larger network pipes.

    Much like a biological system I also think you will start to see intelligent network pipe cache systems with logic built in that will allow a packet request to not have to make a full round trip to a host server but short circuit for a logical instruction cycle withing the first network node.

    Very much like a biological system can respond to certain stimuli without having to go all the way to the brain.

  2. If the datacenter has limited space, blade servers are a particularly good choice. Some blade server vendors claim that up to 50 percent more blade servers can be installed in a standard 42U rack as compared to rack servers. What’s more, blade servers consume less power as they are more energy efficient and requires lesser cooling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s